- #Rawtherapee linux use gpu upgrade
- #Rawtherapee linux use gpu pro
- #Rawtherapee linux use gpu Pc
- #Rawtherapee linux use gpu plus
- #Rawtherapee linux use gpu free
Importing: ASP no need to import to do enough tasks with files.LR - sloooow (on Core i5 3550, 16GB RAM, Win7) I understand there might be some subjectiveness into this, please let me know with comments if there's any interest in making the answer a collaborative wiki.ĪfterShotPro 1.0.1 = ASP, Lightroom = LR 4.1 (sorry I don't have personal experience with DarkTable) There is more than just the features for instance I hear color management on Linux is hard - I don't want to launch an off-topic discussion about it, but if there's a very strong agreement on such a point it will be an issue against DarkTable(edit: i investigated and it's actually false). Price is of course an element of the comparison, but only at an equal feature point. My experience though is that it takes way more than 30 days to discover the real features AND limitations of this kind of software. I do know that lightroom is great and that you don't get wrong with that -), and that I could test drive all of them.
#Rawtherapee linux use gpu plus
I'm wondering whether somebody has been able to test them all (or most!) and provide a first-person feedback on which features stand up / are lacking in comparison, plus any additional experience advise in comparing these software. (I do not have a mac so Aperture is not an option)
#Rawtherapee linux use gpu free
#Rawtherapee linux use gpu pro
Corel AfterShot Pro now on sale at 59.9$ from 99.9$.I'm quite satisfied with Picasa as a catalogue, definitely not for any photo processing other thank a quick saturation and sharpening bumb, but without local edits it does not work all the time. I'll be trying to shot more raw as soon as I realize that, with the appropriate tool, the result is worth it over in-camera jpg conversion.enhance my pics (mostly jpg*) with a fair balance of feature vs.The basic of what I'm looking into is a step-up, single stop (if possible!) solution to:
#Rawtherapee linux use gpu upgrade
Conundrum.I understand that I should upgrade from my basic workflow (mostly Picasa + some Cyberlink PhotoDirector). I'd probably get it on Black Friday or Cyber Monday. Is it worth getting the speed with the cost or save money with less speed? It could be a difference of about $340 between the lowest & highest CPU, plus the energy use. Get the 65W Ryzen 7 5700X or spring for the 105W Ryzen 9 5900X/5950X? There's a pretty big difference in performance, cost, & power consumption. I don't play video games outside of using RetroArch to play old-skool NES, SNES, TurboGrafx-16, Genesis, PlayStation, Neo-Geo, Mame-arcade, & related. The Radeon RX 580 video card is good enough for me. I don't really need to upgrade anything else. All my files (documents, music, RAW, jpeg, etc.) are on an 8TB 7200RPM spinning drive that I got about a year ago. It probably won't make much of a difference, though. They've come down in price compared to what they were selling for when I built the machine. I might replace that m.2 drive with one that has a PCI-Express 4.0 x4 interface. My machine has 64GB of RAM & a 500GB PCI-Express 3.0 m.2 drive. Compared to the old AMD FX-8350, it's a night & day difference in speed. Like I said, the current R圜PU works very well. I would still be far ahead with the 5900X/5950X when compared to the old TDP 125W design of the FX-8350 in terms of power consumption, but I would rather save more energy if possible. The Ryzen 7 5800X doesn't seem so attractive with its slight performance boost & much increased energy consumption. Ultimately, the 105W CPU draws more electricity. I'm just trying to figure out if the Ryzen 7 5700X will provide enough of a performance boost while "saving" energy with its TDP 65W design or just spring for the Ryzen 9 5900X/5950X that offers more performance, but with the increased energy consumption penalty.
#Rawtherapee linux use gpu Pc
Obviously, many other applications that I use on the PC would also benefit from a CPU upgrade. The Ryzen 9 5900X seems to be the fastest CPU that my motherboard can use for RawTherapee. I'm guessing benchmark figures for the Ry& 7 5700X, since they're not on the list. Ryzen 7 5700X = +-51 seconds (guesstimate) ^ This link has a section where it shows a RawTherapee benchmark. It would take the FX-8350 about +-10 seconds to convert a K-50 RAW file into a jpeg & about +-2.5 seconds for the Ryzen 5 3600.Īfter crunching numbers, seeing what's compatible with my Gigabyte B550 motherboard, & whatnot, I'm thinking of replacing that R圜PU with one of the following CPUs:ĪMD Ryzen 7 5800X Linux Performance Review - Phoronix It's far quicker than the old FX-8350, but it would be nice if it could still run faster than what it currently does. The only thing that I wish could run a bit more faster is RawTherapee, particularly when I'm batching hundreds to thousands of RAW files. Compared to the old FX-8350, the Ryis leaps & bounds faster.
In August of 2020, I built a new AMD machine with this CPU:
0 kommentar(er)
